Skip to content

PulsePlus ROI Calculator

Version: 1.0 | Last Updated: Nov 2025


How to Use This Calculator

  1. Input customer data in Section 1: Inputs
  2. Review calculated metrics in Section 2: Current State Costs
  3. See projected improvements in Section 3: With PulsePlus
  4. Review final ROI summary in Section 4: ROI Analysis

SECTION 1: INPUTS

Company Information

  • Company Name: [ENTER]
  • Industry: [ENTER]
  • Number of Employees: [ENTER]
  • Average Employee Salary: $[ENTER]

Current State Metrics

  • Employee Engagement Score: [ENTER]% (out of 100)
  • Annual Voluntary Turnover Rate: [ENTER]%
  • Training Completion Rate: [ENTER]%
  • Average New Hire Ramp Time: [ENTER] months

Use Case Specific (select one or multiple)

For Recruiting:

  • Number of Recruiters: [ENTER]
  • Current Quota Attainment Rate: [ENTER]%
  • Average Hires per Recruiter/Month: [ENTER]
  • Average Cost per Hire: $[ENTER]

For IT Service Desk:

  • Number of Support Agents: [ENTER]
  • Current CSAT Score: [ENTER]%
  • Current First-Call Resolution Rate: [ENTER]%
  • Average Ticket Resolution Time: [ENTER] hours

For Sales:

  • Number of Sales Reps: [ENTER]
  • Current Quota Attainment: [ENTER]%
  • Average Deal Size: $[ENTER]
  • Sales Cycle Length: [ENTER] days

For OCM/Change Management:

  • Employees Impacted by Change: [ENTER]
  • Change Initiative Budget: $[ENTER]
  • Current Adoption Rate (if known): [ENTER]%
  • Target Adoption Timeline: [ENTER] months

SECTION 2: CURRENT STATE COSTS

Turnover Cost Calculation

Formula:Turnover Cost = (# Employees × Turnover Rate × Avg Salary × Replacement Cost Multiplier)

Replacement Cost Multiplier: 1.5x salary (industry standard)

Calculation:

  • Employees affected: [# EMPLOYEES]
  • Turnover rate: [TURNOVER %]
  • Employees leaving annually: [# EMPLOYEES × TURNOVER %] = [RESULT]
  • Average salary: $[AVG SALARY]
  • Replacement cost per employee: $[AVG SALARY × 1.5] = $[RESULT]
  • Annual Turnover Cost: [EMPLOYEES LEAVING × REPLACEMENT COST] = $[TOTAL]

Productivity Loss Calculation

Formula:Productivity Loss = (# Disengaged Employees × Avg Salary × Productivity Loss %)

Assumptions:

  • Disengaged employees: Based on engagement score below 70%
  • Productivity loss: 20% for disengaged employees (industry research)

Calculation:

  • Engagement score: [SCORE]%
  • Estimated disengaged employees: [# EMPLOYEES × (100 - SCORE)/100] = [RESULT]
  • Productivity loss per disengaged employee: $[AVG SALARY × 0.20] = $[RESULT]
  • Annual Productivity Loss: [DISENGAGED EMPLOYEES × PRODUCTIVITY LOSS] = $[TOTAL]

Training Inefficiency Cost

Formula:Training Cost = (# Employees × Training Hours × Hourly Rate) / Completion Rate

Assumptions:

  • Average training hours per employee per year: 40 hours
  • Hourly rate: $[AVG SALARY / 2080] (annual salary ÷ work hours)

Calculation:

  • Training hours per employee: 40 hours
  • Hourly rate: $[HOURLY RATE]
  • Cost per employee if 100% completion: 40 × $[HOURLY RATE] = $[RESULT]
  • Current completion rate: [COMPLETION %]%
  • Actual cost (accounting for incomplete training): $[COST] / [COMPLETION %] = $[RESULT]
  • Wasted training cost (incomplete): $[TOTAL SPENT] - $[EFFECTIVE VALUE] = $[WASTE]
  • Annual Training Waste: $[WASTE × # EMPLOYEES] = $[TOTAL]

Long Ramp Time Cost (New Hires)

Formula:Ramp Cost = (New Hires per Year × Avg Salary × Ramp Time in Months / 12 × Productivity Loss %)

Assumptions:

  • New hires per year: [# EMPLOYEES × TURNOVER RATE]
  • Ramp time: [MONTHS] months
  • Productivity during ramp: 50% (average)

Calculation:

  • New hires annually: [RESULT]
  • Months to full productivity: [MONTHS]
  • Lost productivity per new hire: $[AVG SALARY × MONTHS/12 × 0.5] = $[RESULT]
  • Annual Ramp Cost: [NEW HIRES × LOST PRODUCTIVITY] = $[TOTAL]

TOTAL CURRENT STATE COST

Cost CategoryAnnual Cost
Turnover$[AMOUNT]
Productivity Loss$[AMOUNT]
Training Waste$[AMOUNT]
Ramp Time Cost$[AMOUNT]
TOTAL$[TOTAL]

SECTION 3: WITH PULSEPLUS (Projected Improvements)

Research-Backed Improvement Metrics

Based on Microsoft, IBM, and Deloitte research on gamification:

Engagement & Retention:

  • Engagement improvement: +40 points (typical increase)
  • Turnover reduction: 30-40% (we'll use conservative 30%)

Productivity:

  • Productivity gain: 90% (Microsoft research)
  • Applied conservatively: 20% improvement on engaged employees

Training:

  • Completion rate improvement: 226% (IBM research)
  • Applied: Increase from [CURRENT %] to 85%

Ramp Time:

  • Ramp time reduction: 40% faster (gamification research)
  • New ramp time: [CURRENT MONTHS × 0.6] months

Projected Cost Reductions

Turnover Cost Reduction

New Turnover Rate: [CURRENT RATE × 0.7]% (30% reduction)

Calculation:

  • New employees leaving: [# EMPLOYEES × NEW RATE] = [RESULT]
  • New annual turnover cost: $[RESULT]
  • Savings: $[OLD COST - NEW COST] = $[SAVINGS]

Productivity Gain Value

New Engagement Score: [CURRENT SCORE + 40]% (or 95%, whichever is lower)

Calculation:

  • Previously disengaged employees now engaged: [IMPROVEMENT]
  • Productivity gain per employee: $[AVG SALARY × 0.20] = $[RESULT]
  • Value Created: [ENGAGED EMPLOYEES × PRODUCTIVITY GAIN] = $[TOTAL]

Training Efficiency Gain

New Completion Rate: 85% (conservative, IBM shows 226% improvement)

Calculation:

  • Old waste: $[AMOUNT]
  • New waste: $[MUCH LOWER]
  • Savings: $[DIFFERENCE]

Ramp Time Reduction Value

New Ramp Time: [OLD TIME × 0.6] months (40% faster)

Calculation:

  • Old ramp cost: $[AMOUNT]
  • New ramp cost: $[AMOUNT × 0.6]
  • Savings: $[DIFFERENCE]

TOTAL PROJECTED VALUE WITH PULSEPLUS

Benefit CategoryAnnual Value
Turnover Reduction$[SAVINGS]
Productivity Gains$[VALUE]
Training Efficiency$[SAVINGS]
Faster Ramp Time$[SAVINGS]
TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFIT$[TOTAL]

SECTION 4: ROI ANALYSIS

PulsePlus Investment

Pricing:

  • Users: [# EMPLOYEES]
  • Plan: $[PRICE PER USER]/user/month
  • Annual subscription: $[# EMPLOYEES × PRICE × 12] = $[TOTAL]
  • Implementation (one-time): $[AMOUNT]

Year 1 Total Investment: $[SUBSCRIPTION + IMPLEMENTATION]Year 2+ Investment: $[SUBSCRIPTION ONLY]


ROI Calculation

Year 1:

  • Total benefit: $[TOTAL BENEFIT]
  • Total investment: $[TOTAL INVESTMENT]
  • Net benefit: $[BENEFIT - INVESTMENT]
  • ROI: [(BENEFIT - INVESTMENT) / INVESTMENT × 100]% = [RESULT]%
  • Payback period: [INVESTMENT / (BENEFIT/12)] = [X] months

Year 2:

  • Total benefit: $[TOTAL BENEFIT] (same or improved)
  • Total investment: $[SUBSCRIPTION ONLY]
  • Net benefit: $[BENEFIT - INVESTMENT]
  • ROI: [CALCULATION]% = [RESULT]%

Year 3:

  • Total benefit: $[TOTAL BENEFIT]
  • Total investment: $[SUBSCRIPTION ONLY]
  • Net benefit: $[BENEFIT - INVESTMENT]
  • ROI: [CALCULATION]% = [RESULT]%

3-Year Summary

YearInvestmentBenefitNet ValueROI
Year 1$[AMT]$[AMT]$[AMT][X]%
Year 2$[AMT]$[AMT]$[AMT][X]%
Year 3$[AMT]$[AMT]$[AMT][X]%
Total$[AMT]$[AMT]$[AMT][X]%

SECTION 5: INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC ROI EXAMPLES

Example 1: Recruiting Team

Inputs:

  • 50 recruiters
  • 58% current quota attainment
  • 500 hires/year target
  • $70k average cost per hire

Current State:

  • Hires achieved: 290 (58% of 500)
  • Hires missed: 210
  • Value of unfilled positions: $14.7M

With PulsePlus:

  • New quota attainment: 78% (+20%)
  • Hires achieved: 390
  • Hires missed: 110
  • Value of unfilled positions: $7.7M
  • Value gained: $7M annually

ROI: 15x on $500k investment


Example 2: IT Service Desk

Inputs:

  • 100 support agents
  • 40% annual turnover
  • $50k average salary
  • 75% CSAT score

Current State:

  • Turnover cost: $3M annually
  • Low CSAT impacts brand value

With PulsePlus:

  • New turnover: 25% (-15 points)
  • Turnover cost: $1.9M
  • Savings: $1.1M annually
  • CSAT improvement: +13 points → better brand value

ROI: 7x on $150k investment


Example 3: Sales Team

Inputs:

  • 40 sales reps
  • 60% quota attainment
  • $500k quota per rep

Current State:

  • Revenue: $12M (60% of $20M potential)
  • $8M quota missed

With PulsePlus:

  • New quota attainment: 78%
  • Revenue: $15.6M
  • Additional revenue: $3.6M

ROI: 18x on $200k investment


SECTION 6: CONSERVATIVE vs. AGGRESSIVE SCENARIOS

Conservative Scenario (Use for Risk-Averse Customers)

Improvements:

  • Turnover reduction: 20% (vs. 30-40%)
  • Engagement improvement: +20 points (vs. +40)
  • Training completion: +50% (vs. 226%)
  • Ramp time: 25% faster (vs. 40%)

Resulting ROI: Typically 3-5x in Year 1


Aggressive Scenario (Use for Early Adopters)

Improvements:

  • Turnover reduction: 40%
  • Engagement improvement: +40 points
  • Training completion: 226% (IBM research)
  • Ramp time: 40% faster

Resulting ROI: Typically 8-12x in Year 1


How to Present ROI

For CFOs

  • Focus on: Hard dollar savings (turnover, training waste)
  • Show: 3-year net present value
  • Include: Payback period (typically 6-12 months)
  • Emphasize: Conservative estimates used

For CHROs

  • Focus on: Engagement improvements, retention, culture
  • Show: Before/after metrics
  • Include: Employee satisfaction impact
  • Emphasize: Research-backed effectiveness

For Operations Leaders

  • Focus on: Productivity gains, efficiency improvements
  • Show: Time savings, output increases
  • Include: Process improvement metrics
  • Emphasize: Measurable business outcomes

Notes & Assumptions

Sources:

  • Microsoft research: 90% productivity gains with gamification
  • IBM research: 226% training completion, 694% exam pass rates
  • Deloitte research: 47% user return rate improvement
  • Industry research: 89% workplace happiness increase

Assumptions:

  • Replacement cost = 1.5x annual salary (Society for Human Resource Management)
  • Disengaged productivity loss = 20% (Gallup research)
  • Training hours = 40 per employee per year (industry average)
  • Ramp time productivity = 50% during learning period

Customization: Adjust these assumptions based on customer's actual data when available.


Document Owner: Sales Operations Review Cadence: Quarterly (update with new research data)

PulsePlus Sales Enablement Library